What's wrong with the site? What you don't like about the site? Only honest opinions please.
You know very well the faults of @nysubj: Technocratic, Tyrannical Authoritarianism--always favorably skewed to the left. Just how long do you think grown-ass adults are going to take your despotic moderators' (JD) condescension, insults and arbitrary suspensions/banning based on SPITE-WORK?
I have such bad associations I even close my preview window of @nysubj.com from Dosmovies.
I have nothing against you Doc.personally--but you upheld and enabled the sh*t-show wrought by your capricious mod.--that's guilt by assention.
I'll not be back there--nor will anyone else with any self-respect, independent thought or dignity. You couldn't allow adults to sort out their differences which is an insult to their intelligence and reasoning skills--I.m not talking about outright abuse or threats--I'm talking about ideology and philosophy.
You have allowed what started out as an interesting info./news aggregate turn into a CCP-Type censoring apparatus that punished its' members for not towing the acoustics of a liberal echo-chamber.
Yeah, well, GOOD LUCK on that.
Still love dosmovies though--certain swamp-donkeys seem to have their reins curbed here--thanks be to Jesus.
@nysubj.comm hath become Clownworld.com. Read moreLess
@Tamperer71 If it were any farther right, you would be constantly tripping over your right foot. That just makes no sense.
@Tamperer71 Actually you are not welcome there anymore. You are still serving a 181 Day Suspension and you have 3 months to go. So its not really that you have a choice in staying away...
@JudgeDredd I've forgotten that Viper Pit you CORRUPTLY lord over in proxy , you tell me WHO IS COUNTING THE DAYS JUDGE SPITE?
@Tamperer71 Well, you better start counting...
@Tamperer71 You were baited in to that!
@Tamperer71 Gotta Love That Look...Classic!
@Tamperer71 Damn right!
With All due respect DOC...
~I remember bout 1000 members on your site Doc..
💥Then you were advised to split it!!
💥Then you put RB and now mandale in FULL charge..BOTH nutjob d**k`taters
now they are destroyed!!! ONE is dead and 2m 288 online right now.
Makes me sad. I loved your work and your site DOC
I see no decrease in HATE SPEACH,but I SEE AN INCREASE IN HATE on zerosub site!
@1FRAC1 I see you have mandale mod here too!
@1FRAC1 DOC asked a question. People answer that question and get banned!
so this question is ban bait?
@1FRAC1 Ban bait
@1FRAC1 Online numbers changed because we removed links, not because of mods.
@Dr.Evil Anysubj low attendance has nothing to do with the links. Doc, you don't need an expertise of a genius to figure out what forum needs to have to function properly.
Change the TOS.
@Omenomen How to change?
@Dr.Evil Just get rid of that racism and sexism rule. People have been suspended for posting memes and jokes. If somebody is calling for a lynch, that is ok. Suspend him. For a joke or an elaborated opinion, or for giving data, it must not be the case.
Also for the content showing violence. We are not allowed to post things we found on YT. Millions of people are complaining on YT already. And here, our choice of posting is even narrower. Who can be harmed for viewing fight on a Yellow Vests protests or shooting occurring in a dark alley, that was taken in 240p resolution. Common!
Let suspension (according to the rules, ofc) be reserved for those posting porn or constantly spam. I think we all can agree on that.
I noticed one more thing. When somebody block you on anysubj, you are not allowed to read, comment and upvote his posts. So, when you are reading a comment section, you see blanc spaces, it's so unnatural. Moreover, people are trashing each other knowing that the others will not be able to see what they say. So, that block option also need some correction. He re is what I suggest.
Block should work only on PM and Wall level. When somebody is posting stuff or commenting on forum, everybody should be able to see and reply. Only our vanity prevent us to hear what we do not want to. Read moreLess
@Omenomen Just get rid of that racism and sexism rule. - impossible. I would better close the site completely. Racism memes are still racism.
About blocking - never heard any complaints, on facebook it works in a similar matter but you don't see that you have been blocked.
By the way those YT videos being deleted but a little bit later because of slow moderation. They are really strict and know the law.
@JudgeDredd I feel like a teacher complaining to a parent about behavior of his kid. The parent is defending the little one. So, the kid is standing behind the parent, grinning and smiling.
@Omenomen Interesting analogy you chose. Especially when the teacher wants to allow racism and sexism in the classroom. I have to say that a school where the kid disciplines the teacher is a school I have never seen.
@Dr.Evil Facebook is not a forum.
And no, MSM are covering "violent content", so they stay on YT.
@Omenomen Anysubj is not a forum. It's a mix of forum and social network. Forums have another type of layout.
@Dr.Evil And what it is? It has a public chat. It's so different from facebook. Anyway, how would you define it?
@Dr.Evil It is sexism to post your bout naked girlie posts. Get rid of them then. TOS
@Dr.Evil Imagine if classic comedians and their funniest routines got posted here.. Like Don Rickles or Red Foxx. How about Chris Rock? Is making fun of ethnic ways and culture to redefined as racism and bigotry in the age of cancel culture? Or have you already started?
I like it, I love it, I want some more of it.
A wonderful compliment to dosmovies. I'd be a member of each at twice the price.
Well done Dr. Evil. Thanks for all the hard work and sacrifice.
There will always be problems when we talk about politics, money, or religion.
I think there's even a golden rule regarding it.
I avoid anysubj as the users skewed so far right, it is impossible to say anything without being covered by an avalanche of stupidity. That seems to be why the modding is so necessary.
@Xanthe199 A Karen would demand moderation, wouldn't she @xantha199?
@Tamperer71 Why Tamper gets a warning for using Karen word, and that girl not for calling out us conservatives for avalanche of stupidity? I am asking now the same question I asked Box. Who are those users? Name them or restrain of spitting bullsh*t. I am sick of being called out.
@Omenomen Unless you consider yourself far-right, I dont see how this comment is addressed to you.
@JudgeDredd It doesn't matter whom I consider myself. It is elementary culture and basic civility you name the one you accuse. This way it could be anybody and everybody. I just want the names.
@Omenomen And as I told you on that thread, all you have to do is look them up yourself:
@JudgeDredd No. That is lists and posts you suspended people on. You did not call them racists. So, you can say: "Racist comment = racist man", but it's still YOU! I want a caller call the names.
@Omenomen Well, I didnt suspend these people for their intelligence. And yeah, 300 infractions do qualify as an avalanche of stupidity.......and probably thats an understatement too
@JudgeDredd Dancing around and around. You know that even the ancient Romans had the law that the accused had right to meet his accuser face to face. That means no secret reports, no secret trials. And do not hide the accusers behind Active moderation page, please. They are grown people, with a spine. They can speak for themselves.
@Omenomen And I am speaking for myself. The infractions were issued on the basis of
a) substantiated complaints which were verified on their standing by the Administration; and
b) violations found as a result of an ex officio investigation by the Administration.
If you wish to discuss the merits of any of the infractions issued, please be so kind to PM with your request.
As this discussion is getting closer and closer to the Publicly Discussing Admin Actions prohibition, as far as I am concerned, this public discussion is over.
@JudgeDredd Kirk out
@Omenomen Avalanche of stupidity, yes that sums up the political comments.
Maybe litany of lies (Justice Mahon) for the medical BS.
@Tamperer71 love this post
fracella is back!! WELCOME BACK DARLIN'!!!!
Anysubj is full of political extremists, pseudo-medical cr*p, haters and a-holes.
I pop in sometime for a laugh and wind them up.
But that's good... keep them there to rant among themselves, away from normal folk in here who come to relax and share entertainment.
I would like politics and conspiracies banned from here.
Lets suppose, for the sake of the argument, that we accept that the Politics and the Political Memes communities are the source of all evil and all conflict in the site. If we were to remove them, do you see any value for the rest of the communities? Would you participate in the forums if we kept it strictly fun, hobbies and games?
@Tamperer71 I consider this a challenge. You got 181 Days of Suspension out of 9 lines in Chat. What do you think I can do with 2 min and 11 seconds of abuse? Probably something in the range of 181 years of suspension.
So yeah, keep it up. Test your luck
@Tamperer71 love this post too
@1FRAC1 i still DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW A BOUNCY , knee-slappin' COUNTRY SONG GOT ME A WARNING.
it's got a good beat and you can dance to it...so what's the problem??
I just don't understand!! hmmmf SMH
Didn't I tell ya Dosmovies is always there for a hearty chuck-chuck-chuckle...
@JudgeDredd Remove Political Memes ?
What ever shall I do then?
@Bread&Circuses Start using words? (This laughter emoji is not meant to be perceived as an expression of belittlement)
@JudgeDredd A mother told a story about how she didn't want her children to learn violence, so she never bought any toys that looked like weapons. One day she heard "BANG BANG! BANG BANG! I GOT YOU!" coming from the living room. Thinking her boys found toy guns, she stormed into the living room only to find them holding bananas like they were pistols... There are games we will play, even if no one shows us how. It's in our nature.
Apparently the leprosy of @nysubj.com is infecting dosmovies--my forum thread ON vaccine ingredients was quietly and without explanation REMOVED. Soros and Gates would be proud.
Rest assured folks--THE MINISTRY OF TRUTH is handling all "misinformation" for you. Well done KARENS.
@Tamperer71 Hey, she no wearing a mask...somebody get a Mod.!
@Tamperer71 That is so... Warped and Twisted!
I like it
SO THE PERSECUTION IN TYRANNICAL CENSORSHIP CONTINUES. See above as I'm up to 3 warnings FOR HAVING AN UNFAVORABLE OPINION. That's what's wrong with @nysubj. Better read fast as the deletion of dissent is upon us.
@Tamperer71 Lets see....3 instances of "Karen", 1 swamp-donkey, 1 JUDGE SPITE and 1 corruption for me, 1 leprosy, 1 Viper-Pit and 1 Clownworld.com for the Admin, and lets not forget your wonderful video testimony of what will happen to me if consume a Viagra.
I would say your definition of "UNFAVORABLE OPINION" needs a little work....
@JudgeDredd uh-oh--someone's got an abacus...
I have two things to say, and they are both about anysubj, but I guess it goes for docmovies as well. First, I would like we have no moderation at all. I mean, what fool would post porn or something like that? I would like we are able to say whatever we want to, whoever we want to and about anyone we want to.
The second thing is blocking users. I think that one should block someone only on a personal level, which includes his PM and his Wall. When you go into chat, you are entering a public realm, baby. Everybody can see, like and comment your comments and posts. Grow up, men! These are only words!
What is the point of suspending [SPOILER]suspending from a rope? Just a thought... unpleasant a-holes on Anysubj if they can still come to 2M and fill the forums with garbage?
I suggest tightening the standards here but allowing free-rein on Anycrap so a few offensive idiots can rant to each other harmlessly.
You do realize that this constitutes your reply to the Admin, right?
Now, you know that the Admin is nice and tolerant but you also know I am neither of these two.
So what exactly goes through your mind to post a comment that constitutes an attack against the Administration, especially when a 7 Day Suspension was just issued 15 minutes prior to your comment and which is the reason for your comment?
@JudgeDredd Sorry-pardon Judge, I would never attack the Administration.
Rather, I am supporting the removal of troublesome a-holes from 2M to their own playpen.
@Buttless Their own playpen will be anywhere BUT Anysubj. The days of the Wild West are over. You've been there, you have seen what I am talking about.
@Buttless looks like personal attack on a group! I am NOT surprised that YOU didn't get a warning.
@1FRAC1 Did you catch the spoiler where brain-less calls for our lynching? That's perfectly acceptable in a 2 tiered system.
Pretty much what Buttless said, let em do what they want on anysub, this isnt the place for the vast majority of it.
@Stickmanuk You dont understand. We do not want them and we have kicked them out. We are abuse free and we have no tolerance for such conduct.
@JudgeDredd pretty much what i meant but far more eloquent ;)
@Stickmanuk I was referring to Anysubj
I just asked for opinions and how to make that site better.
@Dr.Evil OK Doc.. Bring back the Wild West
Perhaps in an adult only chat and forum.
Second, Start a petition drive worldwide to demand our entertainment be propaganda and official govt policy/agenda free. Just want escapism and entertainment.
@Dr.Evil Why are you ignoring perfectly good and implementable solutions being offered--especially by some who you have already blatantly blacklisted? This thread is pointless--I'm starting to think you just put it out to further identify and isolate/chastise "The conservative troublemakers".
Ban bate? Yep seems like that's exactly what's goin on here Doc.
As soon as people start speaking their minds, out come the threats. How in the world can anyone be expected to offer honest opinions with the sword of Damocles perched precariously over their ever utterance?
Since the whole "full moderation is now in effect" campaign began I've seen bans for almost nothing and numerous examples of the same type behavior by other members without so much as a peep in terms of moderation.
The slant in terms of which type of user gets the condescension or punted outta the site is so stark it's amazing.
We conservatives are always the ones receiving the brunt of the moderation. This is absolutely astounding when some of the most rabid of all comments I've read there were from the other side of the aisle and never a friggin peep about that snot slingin crew.
I remember quite well in early discussions about anysub were tendered as a way to delineate the political discussions away from the 2 Movies forums since the dissension factor was deemed detrimental to the site. Anysub was supposed to remove that faction and give it a home where it would not effect the tenor of the 2 Movies forums.
I lauded that idea at the time but mentioned then that if such a place were to exist its very nature would require it to be unmoderated for the most part, a place where the gloves come off and people should be allowed to freely speak their minds.
So, anysub hits the street and everything seemed fine until lo and behold, people did start to really speak up.
What happened next was those too meek to handle the fray began to complain and whine about the content and tenor of what was being said, just like they had done on 2 Movies that had been the impetus for anysub in the 1st place!
Instead of choosing to simply not venture into the anysub forums they found so appalling they chose instead to do so, then whine on ad infinitum about the content there.
If you actually are seeking real suggestions here and not just using this thread to pull a bait and switch "Hey, what are your suggestions? OK, so now you're banned for doing so!" routine, here's mine.
Stop moderating anysub. The moderation is so one sided anyway, so what's the point unless your intent with anysub is to create an echo chamber for the left to back slap one another every time a conservative actually tries to speak their mind and gets an infraction or the boot.
If you want to improve anysub stop the constant threats of bans and actual bans for people expressing their opinions.
Now, having stated my opinion I'll just sit here waiting for the ban hammer to drop on me again Read moreLess
@mrkim56 You were lucky, my friend, you remember the times of Wild West. I came after it was over. Now, I see that the entire political topic is closed to October 20th. I will not spend my time there until that day. I, who almost never posted political content. Moreover, I read this thread, and I realize I am not welcome there (We do not want them and we have kicked them out). So, I guess, they will have one less they have to worry about.
@Omenomen A great performance worthy of an Oscar.
This is the second time in this very thread that you attempt to claim victim-hood status on matters that you havent been associated with. Why is that?
Why do you identify with the group that has been kicked out when you havent been kicked out? Why do you identify with the repeat offenders when you havent received an infraction in 3 months?
@JudgeDredd There are two answers to that, my friend, of which, I assume, you would understand at least one.
First, I was suspended for acting as I normally would. That is (was) my true nature. Being adaptive is my feature; that does not mean I like what I am adapted on.
The second thing. I identify myself with my friends. In those three months, you have banned two of them, one has left on his own. And now, I have only a few who left on the site; they are the reason I stayed there. But every time you cut off somebody I was really close to, you cut off me.
That is why I feel being persecuted.
@Omenomen Oh, I understand both. Because you take full responsibility for your actions and your own nature. And this is why you have my respect.
In stark contrast to your friends, you are not trying to persuade me that statements like:
"the hype snoflake changing language to cover his snow white ass pu**y is scared now after years of spewing hate from those pretty lips his guts will be a good trophy to stomp in while crushing his skull in the hands of the righteous."
are entirely innocent and uttered in good fun. And I am sorry to say but your friends that got banned had it coming for many months. They made the mistake of misinterpreting patience for weakness. You were smart and adapted. They didnt.
@Omenomen I stopped going there too. That side has become jaded and to Robusto for me.Can't say anything without them attacking. I won't honor them with my scalp any longer. I have other sites for news. At first it was nice to be able to just do it all here but times have changed.
@mrkim56 Since we are honest here, I am astounded by the logic of your argument. You are suggesting that an opinion that is accompanied or comprised by derogatory, abusive, insulting and harassing remarks is nothing more than an honest opinion and as such should not be penalized or limited in any way. In fact it should be applauded.
To that I wonder......are you exercising that kind of speech out in public? Because if you would, retribution in the form of a physical confrontation is a dead certainty. And when the victim of your opinion pummels you to the ground, or worse, files a criminal complaint against you for abuse and defamation, am I to believe you will argue that point in court?
Out of curiosity...what will your reaction be, when you happen to be on the receiving end of such an honest opinion? Are you gonna sit and take it without complaining? Are you gonna respect the right of your opponent to call you a nutjob d**k`tater, a swamp-donkey, or plainly a d**k? Even when it is completely unprovoked? Perhaps to you, such language has lost its derogatory meaning, but I assure you the same doesnt apply to me.
You make a differentiation between Right and Left and you imply that your distinction influences the moderation. In reality, my distinction is between the occasional violator and the persistent violator. To be more specific, the moderation follows the golden rule:
“errare humanum est, sed perseverare diabolicum: 'to err is human, but to persist (in the mistake) is diabolical.”
For the occasional violator I exercise reason, common sense and a broad interpretation of the rules. For the persistent violator, I exercise zero tolerance and strict interpretation of the rules.
You say that it is the Conservatives that bear the grunt of the moderation. I say that it is the Racists, the Sexists, the Bigots, the serial Abusers, irrespective of political affiliations. If you insist in labeling that group or identify yourself with that group, or worse defend them, then I am afraid that this discussion will go nowhere. Because not in a million years I will allow for abuse, harassment, bullying and any form of anti-social behavior to be held at a higher standard than respect for our fellow man and the protection of the ones that cant protect themselves.
You make some bold statements but offer no evidence to support them. Statements such as:
"I've seen bans for almost nothing and numerous examples of the same type behavior by other members without so much as a peep in terms of moderation."
"some of the most rabid of all comments I've read there were from the other side of the aisle and never a friggin peep about that snot slingin crew."
To that end, I invite you to offer examples of such conduct. Read moreLess
Yep, I'm just as frank in reality as I am anywhere else.
You claim that in doing so I should expect physical violence as a byproduct of such actions. Hmm, that's quite interesting. So voicing my contrary opinion (by your summation) then should allow violence as a repercussion? Really?
I on the other hand view things differently. I am quite willing to allow anyone to vocalize their thoughts and even welcome that scenario as it means real communication between 2 thinking adults is then taking place.
However, I do not anticipate nor expect violence as a byproduct of that communication while it seems by your statements that it must be some allowable result. What a shame that a person of your intellectual capacity should also choose to embrace such a low brow reaction to a difference of opinions.
No I don't go running and tattling at every remark I find offensive. Have you ever seen me field such a complaint other than in my post above? Don't bother, it's a rhetorical question we both know the answer to.
The only complaint I've ever logged was about you to Doc, which I received a grand blow off for doing so. After that I knew the point, any point, was moot, so why bother.
You claim that the only people ever to receive reprimands or bans are those who belong to your list of social reprobates.
That statement again seems curious as in my one and only ban from anysub you went straight from no warning of any infractions having occurred to a full on 4 day ban IN AN INSTANT! And it was not for being racist or any of the other litany of SELF DETERMINED positions you like to swing your ban hammer from either.
On that topic, exactly who christened you the ultimate delineator of what is considered racist, sexist, bigots or"serial abusers"?
Are you so above reproach mentally that you are incapable of understanding your own determinations are still just subjective assertions and judgements? Hate to break it to ya man, but yours is NOT the only opinion that matters. That flies here through the threat of adverse reactions for utterances afoul of your opinion, making you a big fish in a small pond, but the world is a much bigger place all in all.
Oh yeah, and then you want me to submit examples of the crap you let slide to "make my case".
What's the point? You read the very same threads as I do and you already have failed to see what I'm talking about so why should I bother?
Look buddy, I like you as a person and we've had some nice personal conversations but when it comes to your actions as a supposed impartial moderator I see them as over bearing, threatening and decidedly one sided>
If you doubt the above I invite you to read back over your ban thread and tally up how many conservative posters vs how many on the left have fallen under your ban hammer "justice". The stats speak volumes about where your sympathies lie. Read moreLess
@mrkim56 Ts ts ts...cherry picking my statements? In what universe does that work?
I said: "You are suggesting that an opinion that is accompanied or comprised by derogatory, abusive, insulting and harassing remarks is nothing more than an honest opinion" and "are you exercising that kind of speech out in public? Because if you would, retribution in the form of a physical confrontation is a dead certainty."
I find it interesting how you bypassed that in order to attribute a different meaning to my statement. And yes really. I do believe that if you walk to a total stranger and called him a nutjob d**k`tater, a swamp-donkey, or plainly a d**k, would result, at minimum, with the loss of your teeth. If you doubt this, you can always put it to the test.
In regards to your suspension, you were flagged for publicly discussing admin actions, stalking, bullying and harassment. You received 4 Days simply because stalking, bullying and harassment belong in the 1 to 4 Day bracket. You received the minimum of 1 day for each of the four violations. And btw, that was your second suspension. Your first was a 1 Day suspension for telling me to "wear it proudly and make sure it has plenty of frilly lace". So spare me the lecture on civility.
As for your question: "exactly who christened you the ultimate delineator of what is considered racist, sexist, bigots or"serial abusers"?" I dont know. I suppose it must be the 6 years of legal training, accompanied by 20 years of practicing the legal profession. As such, what you call as "subjective assertions and judgements" are actually enforcement of legal doctrines, legislation and jurisprudence, pertinent to the violation at hand. Therefore, and in reply to your assertion that my opinion is not the only one that matters, I hate to inform you that when it comes to the application of legislation, only lawyers and judges are qualified to perform that task.
"Oh yeah, and then you want me to submit examples of the crap you let slide to "make my case"......why should I bother?"
Why should you bother? You are not trying to convince me. We have already had this very same discussion twice already and you didnt convince me then. The fact that you made these references clearly shows that you are trying to persuade anyone that would happen to read your comment. However, I speak with facts and you offer none to support your position. Instead, you suggest that I read back the Enforcement threads to prove your point (???) when you clearly haven't read them once. Because if you had, you would have seen the level of abuse that I am allergic to and its repetitive frequency. You would also get a better understanding of the actual number of infractions attributed to either side. And if you havent read the enforcement threads, how can you claim that the stats speak volumes of where my sympathies lie?
Its stuff like:
"Where is that Whackadoodle purple pony haired princess at anyway, slinking about in some socialist sewer sucking up scum; the Trump hating little b**ch? Nutless Euro trash, come one out."
"My god, you are a f**king retard. "So wrong, the bell rings yet again"? What the f**k is that sh*t supposed to mean? It must make some sort of sense in your demented mind. Who says the kind of sh*t you do? Not anyone normal. If you went to high school (which I doubt), then it is obvious you learnt nothing. And you are proud that you only finished high school? Having only a high school education is nothing to be proud of, you poor dumb knuckle dragging retard"
"What the f**k are you talking about. That is the problem with you conservative moron, you rant incoherently and expect others to understand your schizophrenic and delusional rants. But it is ok, I understand that you have a disability and are unable to understand the simplest of concepts. After all, science has proven that conservatism is a result of brain damage, you dumb ass yokel"
"Fuck you, you f**king moron. You f**king can't even understand a f**king simple concept such as "free world", go back to f**king your sister you f**king redneck"
I suppose "honest opinions" like the ones above qualify as "bans for almost nothing"..... Read moreLess
This thread is a good example on how to improve anysubj.
The layout or format aren't an issue so, let's just call the elephant in the room an elephant. The seemingly never ending wave of zealot d-bags.
Don't know why anyj is a magnet to such but, I will say, I definitely see a pattern. Wack-a-mole, don't see Clark Kent and Superman in the same room at the same time type pattern.
Even straight up conspiracy sites such as godlikeproductions don't have the problems to the same scale so, if I had to guess, there's a person or group that got their Cheerios peed in at some point, who made a conscious decision to make anysubj a landing pad.
Obviously you want traffic there from all types, triggered memes and tin foil hats included but, I believe you have to make a call on if you want a truly open forum or, civil discussion. Don't think those are mutually exclusive. Not a fan of censorship but, don't be scared to nuke dumb crap. And that is what it really boils down to for me. Is there any value to it? No? *poof* Gone.
That said, there has been improvement lately and, I find the site enjoyable. I even learn something or chuckle once in awhile. Just don't want to sit in a room full of mosquitos to do it. Read moreLess
There is a need for sites like 8-chan and Ogrish where freaks, extremists and conspiracists can let their fantasies run wild and jerk off among themselves. Noisy, offensive, but contained.
Unfortunately when a few of those same people infest social sites the regulars leave because they don't like weirdos or the garbage they post, like the 2M meltdown a couple of years ago.
The owners of a site can choose what audience they want; 2M got cleaned up (mostly) and has a following but after Anysub got taken over it is too late to kick them out because the moderates have gone.
I'd say Anysub has lost its purpose.
@Buttless I see and look at your words LITERALLY everywhere.
Not even the reviews you partake in make much sense.
I have come to believe you're just an elder fart or hiccup that revels in reading and repeating yourself.
I may be that person soon enough. But for FFS give it a rest
if you want a peaceful place with 6 people anysub is fine. if you want more you have to get rid of your libtard mod jd. all my friends live in the US , most are TRUMP fans and won't put up with that type of censorship.
the fact that you dr e let jd mod here is totally disgusting , at this point you deserve 0 people
@kingoftrump Libtard? Totally disgusting?
Remind me, what was your last suspension for? Oh yeah: CHAT: "kingoftrump yes my pp hurts because judge dread sucks so much,,,, she's a suckin b**ch"
You wont put up with THAT type of censorship? Man, get out of here and take your little pp with you. If you refer to it with the same endearing term that a 5 year old does, I suspect there is a good and valid reason for it. Which would also explain your overly aggressive behavior.
@JudgeDredd That is a totally disgusting comment made in that chat. No one deserves such disrespect. That just shows what kind of person they are to make such a distasteful and repulsive comment. I can't believe he wasn't banned for that.
JD, I think you do a good job of moderating anysubj. They can say you attack conservatives but the active moderation thread speaks for itself. If there are more conservatives disciplined then that is just a fact that speaks for itself.
@JudgeDredd guess i should remind you why you sucked so much,,,,,,,, you followed people around making comments to them till you could get then in trouble,,,,, also the time you censored a conservative site you said was fake news , yet let other sites that are known fakes ,,, plus seen you punish conservatives while allow libs, like don't talk about mods doings while allow box to , more than once, ,
write an entire post on your doings ,,,
@kingoftrump Riiight....so posting repeated warnings to members which replied by telling me to f**k off and which led to their suspension counts as following people around, forcing them to tell me to f**k off so I can suspend them? Nice
The time I censored a conservative site I claimed it was fake news? Are you serious? That was Worldtruth.tv, the most ridiculous site even for Enquirer's standards. And I didnt even censor it.
This is what I wrote 5 months ago:
And this is what happened since:
As for discussing admin actions, I have allowed it on occasion when the situation called for it. But that was mainly for clarification purposes and was never limited to any members specifically. If you had actually bothered once to visit the enforcement threads you would have known that. Unless of course you want me to post screenshots of such interactions to prove your BS. Your call Read moreLess
@JudgeDredd what is failed in being mentioned is that EVERYTHING I EVER POSTED WAS VERIFIABLE, RESEARCHABLE AND IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN--INCLUDING WORLDTRUTH.TV. tHEY DO HAVE SATIRICAL/humourous ARTICLES --BUT I NEVER POSTED THOSE.
I mean What is this? Litanies of spite going back over a year to be recorded and preserved and falsely accused, censored, persecuted and banished unto perpetuity? for what? to what end? Let readers decide for themselves.
Where are we--SOVIET RUSSIAN NKVD? YOU GOT MORE RECORDS THAN THE KGB.
KARMIC WHIPLASH GONNA HURT AND YOU ARE OVERDUE FOR A RECKONING.
You also intimated violence toward me when you said I should have my teeth knocked about a certain inappropriate remark I made--for which I did sincerely apologize for--that you rejected and just continued to be spiteful both towards me and my brethren. WHERE IS THE SCREENSHOT OF THAT--OR DOES IT REMAIN ONE RULE FOR ME AND ANOTHER FOR THEE?
Seriously--do you really want to spend your life committing such heinous acts and being SOURLY remembered for all time as actually being such a small man?
Life is way too short for such foolishness. Read moreLess
@kingoftrump I'm so sorry I missed that chatbox scroll in REAL-TIME--WELL DONE AND HOW VERY SUCCINCTLY STATED
Why, I actually thought it WAS A REAL LAWYER giving a closing argument. BRAVO!
@Tamperer71 Yes, I am sorry too. I would have enjoyed giving you another 30 day vacation as well
@kingoftrump feel free to leave
@kingoftrump AGREE 100%
as far as politics move it to a separate click with a warning , and mod it lightly. then peeps don't ever have to see it unless they agreed to the warning
@kingoftrump I just re-read your suggestion and THAT IS THE VERY BEST ONE i HAVE HEARD: @Dr. Evil are you listening?
The biggest problem is that no new people come. Not even from dosmovies. And why not?
Because round a dozen of ultra right wing (and i mean hardcore)nationalists sits there the whole day. (there are also normal conservatives - i dont have any problem with that.)
I was trying to convince movie fans that are my friends to try it. Whether especially left nor right.
comment: "Hey dosmovies is great. But anysubjekt ? climate change denier, white supremasists etc. What do you want there? thats just waste of time"
i dont think so, but there is much truth in it.
and another thing:
to post links and articles isnt hard to do. But hardly anybody writes post from his own brain. I produced at least 5 video clips and really long articles when i think its interesting. Thats mostly past now.
Just flooding the site with anything from FOX and far worse stuff is boring.
And another word: hail Judge Dredd: he ist the best mod around and life is just like this: if you guys feel lets say a bit inferior towards him in intellectual challenging stuff....
Its very likely true
@Adrian88 And who are those ultra nationalists who ruin the day?
Everybody thinks he has a brain, and sometimes it is hard to prove the opposite. But, God! It so easy to prove a man has no spine.
Do you have spine, Adrian? Can you provide us with a few names?
@Omenomen Oh give it a rest with the names again.
@JudgeDredd Hahaha! You insist on your question, yet mine is so simple and still is swinging like a gallows tree. Maybe somebody step up, somebody with XY combo in his body. Ok, I am stopping here, I don't want to be accused of being a sexist (again)
@Omenomen XXzedra was ultra (banned)
Stephen 19 posts antisemitic stuff all time
not to speak of all the nazi posters that were banned
there were some REALLY hardcore freaks
and of course all who upclick these and vote for Trump
Then there are rather harmless cases like Oldshunter who still thinks Venezuela is in Europe
and there are some conservatives that are smart and like the republicans used to be (till 2016)
example: Mr.Kim (on my friends list) Bready, you and some others
notabene: I was a Bush (SENIOR of course) supporter
Mr.Kim has a good word for his spektrum "strict constitutionalist"
as a lawyer i liked it instantly
Trump&supporters left this field LONG Ago
@Adrian88 'Oldshunter who still thinks Venezuela is in Europe'
And he is correct from a Yankee point of view. All those foreignplaces are the same.
@Adrian88 blahblahhblahhhblahhhh-----I'm sorry what?
YOU HAVE FRIENDS?
PSYCHOPHANTS NEVER HAVE FRIENDS--JUST THE LATEST TEAT YOU PARASITE OFFA--UNTIL AGAIN YOU ARE FLICKED OFF
Bah! Bush was a cockroach. But I understand you, you didn't have much choice anyway.
Zedra is the coolest guy on the site so far, followed by Tamperer, also known as AMBULANCE CHASER!!! LOL! And then, ladies and gentlemen, my awesomeness And how awesome I am one can figure out by reading my statuses (anysubj)
@Omenomen look up
My work is done-now I need to brush the dirt OFFA ME--WHAT!?
That from questionable, unsavory ragamufffin associations (that are so tightly knit--surprising they haven't all succumbed to ccp-19 kung flu).
I lose brain cells in these exchanges and do not wish to continue any the further.
@Tamperer71 "I lose brain cells in these exchanges and do not wish to continue any the further."
Finally, something we both agree on. Any further interactions from you will certainly result in brain-cell numbers diminishing to single digits (not that anyone would notice the difference really)
Doc...If you don't permit freedom...there will be no one there. I thought I might stop in after the Presidential Election, laugh, and get banned from @anysubject. This is NOT, under ANY definition, freedom. ..."The Site Administration has the right but is not obliged to check the Site for prohibited Content and can delete or remove (without giving advance notice) any Content or Users at its own discretion for any reason or without reason" LOL! That's absurd! That FITS the definition of censorship...or dictatorship! Why would ANYONE want to post on a site, in which he has no rights? A place where the truth gets him banned...and at moderators discretion? You wanted to know .."What's wrong with the site? What you don't like about the site? Only honest opinions please."...Well there it is. If you are going to have a site for discussion..Discussion cannot be regulated by one person's opinion. There is NOTHING more important than freedom of speech. ... As everyone has ALWAYS known...if you don't like what you hear or see...respond, don't respond, or leave. Take away a person's voice...and you might as WELL ban them. They will go somewhere else. As long as you aren't threatening anyone, or disclosing personal information...it's just words. If they are TRUE...maybe you will learn something about yourself. Or about them. Freedom of speech is ALL. Like people say about tv...if you don't like it...turn it off. @anysubj. is now part of the "cancel culture"... If you don't like what we say...we are cancelled. Get the mods off of people's backs... ..or close the site. You could let it run riot. You couldn't have any fewer participants. If something doesn't work...don't double down..try something else. What's better for you...hundreds of people on your site fighting....or six that all get along? Read moreLess
@bondojoe Oh, you poor bebe. Where did the bad man hurt you?
@JadeEnigma Hey, Jade! What's up? Is wonderwoman coming to the rescue?
@Omenomen Naw. She's a bit selfish and pig-headed, but Captain Marvel offended too many manly men so I changed.
@JadeEnigma Although I have no idea what you are talking about...I defend your right to say that. Ist amendment.
@bondojoe I am not subject to your silly little constitution, little feller, and apparently those that are still cherry pick the things that suit them and ignore the things that don't anyway, so basically it's a useless little rag.
@JadeEnigma Once again...I applaud your right to make comments..but find them irrelevant.
@bondojoe ANd once again as well, what you find relevant is empty and meaningless and often illegal in many jurisdictions so applaud all you want little man. I found you irrelevant long before you had a hissy fit over yonder. Don't you have some pestilence to spread?
@JadeEnigma I'm sorry that I don't understand you... that was gibberish. But of course ...you have the RIGHT to express it!
@JadeEnigma your comments have nothing to do with the subject.
@JadeEnigma You hate america and americans we get it. No need to run down our constitution or our bill of rights.none of your business if you don't live in this country.
@bondojoe It says a great deal how the left had the problem with freedoms and the right has a problem with losing freedoms. Those who don't know history are damned to repeat it.
@Bread&Circuses Ambassador Spock entered the chat
@Bread&Circuses I always LOVED SPOCK'S FROSTY BLUE EYE-SHADOW...AND THOSE BROWS!!? TWEEZED TO WITHIN AN INCH OF HIS LIFE. GRETA THUNBERG KOVID KISSED TO LEONARD NIMOY--MAY GOD BLESS HIS SOUL. R. I. P.
IN SEARCH OF...AND STILL SEEKING.
@Tamperer71 Great show : dosmovies.com/film/For_the_Love_...
@Bread&Circuses "IT'S MWORSE THAN THAT, HE'S DEAD JIM...AND WE HAVEN'T EVEN GOTTEN TO THE CANNIBALISM YET." : crazy:
................1000% liberty, dignity, fREEDOM AND egalitarianism
Alas since a certain mod has relocated to dosmovies it is now happening here. I got 2 SEPARATE FORUM THREADS ENUMERATING FACTUAL VACCINE INGREDIENTS QUIETLY REMOVED WITHOUT NOTICE HERE PURELY BASED ON THE MOB MENTALITY OF A VERY FEW UNQUESTIONING LIBERALS/SUCK-UPS.
MOB MENTALITY = DEMOCRACY.
THIS IS WHY THE UNITED STATES ARE A REPUBLIC FOR THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE.
I will no longer be contributing to dosmovies. They collect ad revenues for 6 month old posts while THE SILENT MAJORITY ARE QUELLED AND CENSORED.
I also RECEIVED MY FIRST EVER SUSPENSION ON DOSMOVIES IN 5 YEARS FOR POSTING 'TRIGGERED' MEMES (SEE ABOVE).
Great job admin.--you are well on your way to diminishing and killing this site as well.
Nobody NEEDS this site as there are plenty of competitors without your tyrannical dictates. ... Most stick around for friendships cultivated and formed.That may well not hold water if the persecution, punishments and censorship continue. Read moreLess
@Tamperer71 I was planning on coming back..but I won't be contributing either if the moderators are allowed to run unchecked. As you say...there are numerous other places to be. That's where I have been. I DID enjoy the discussions, but apparently they are no longer possible. I DID enjoy writing movie reviews..but I can do that elsewhere also. Bread and Circuses knows where to reach me. I will be sorry to see you go...but like you, I won't stay where I am under a thumb. Freedom IS paramount. It's the reason for the existence of every culture, and every country in existence. You are correct. This site will soon follow @anysubj. I don't require anyone, or any site to make me happy, or for an outlet for my views. But I DO sometimes grace a site that is in error. This site is now in error. Will the Doc save it? We will see. If not, the haters will be lonely..hating each other.
@bondojoe I will miss you and all my darling brethren here too.
FREEDOM SHALL NEVER BE SILENT NOR SILENCED.
I WILL DIE ON MY FEET ARMED TO THE TEETH DEFENDING THE FREEDOM OF ALL RATHER THAN CRAWL ON MY KNEES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SLAVE-MASTERS.
Alas dies laughing as [email protected] hath joined the ranks of the oppressor.
Rest assured--there's a reckoning coming and a force infinitely greater than myself shall be passing judgement on the quiescent sheeple and those subverting them.
History repeats in 80 year cycles as we are complacent in objecting to guaranteed fascism. Evil never rests.
@bondojoe--pm me for further discussion...
just the essence!
What nobody is addressing is that by allowing anything that might be construed as hate speech to go unchecked, it puts both the site and more specifically Doc, in some very real jeopardy.
The key phrase here is '...might be construed as...', whether you agree with it or not. You don't get to pick, some agency makes that determination.
Let's say Doc calls off the mods and the usual suspects go on a high speed runaway. The next thing that happens is it does indeed draw more sympathetic users to the forum, all espousing the same vitriolic 'Free Speech'.
So then some users finally get to the point where they report the site to the Southern Poverty Law Center and they list anysubj as a hate site. Once listed on SPLC, the site listing propagates to all the other watchdog sites and eventually draws the attention of certain three-letter agencies along with Google and social media (bad news travels fast).
Remember the hyper-sensitive times we're in, it can happen.
But it is a way to get anysubj ranked on Google (and DosMovies right along with it)...as a hate site.
I think we owe Doc more than that, this is Doc's 'home', certain kinds of 'free speech' can have damaging consequences in this day and age.
As to what to do with anysubj.com, at this point, Doc might want to consider getting rid of the evidence. Read moreLess
@WAGB283 Thank you God!!!! Finally someone that sees the big picture and the actual reason behind moderation.
Although I entirely agree with you on the possible classification of the Hate Site designation, I should add the other parameters that made Moderation not just a requirement but an absolute necessity.
Criminal Law: Online bullying, abuse, harassment, stalking, intimidation, threatening conduct, defamation, racism, sexism, hate speech, incitement to violence, hateful conduct, unlawful conduct, breach of copyright, obscenity, and countless others are criminal offences. The online medium and internet anonymity rarely shields the perpetrators even with the use of VPN devices. And that is simply because of the nature of the Internet related legislation which requires ISP's to report to the national supervisory body, any instances of breach of applicable terms and conditions, including illegality. If no measures are undertaken by the ISP's themselves, heavy financial penalties or suspension of their operating licenses are expected, especially in cases of gross violations of the laws. Obviously, such measures are usually reserved for instances of illegality that are pending in the applicable national courts and which require a simple criminal complaint by a natural person. And we havent even gotten to the responsibility/liability of the social media websites yet. You see where this is going?
Then you have to take into account the national law of the state where your website is registered, the location of your server, the nationality of the site owner/administrator, as well as the extraterritorial jurisdiction that may be applied by any state which feels that their interests are endangered. In our case that would be the Russian Federation.
Russia has an interesting take on freedom of expression. It has a Mass Media Law that is too vague to provide any legal certainty. Under this law, individuals can be fined up to 400,000 rubles for circulating false information online that leads to a “mass violation of public order”. People who show “blatant disrespect” online for the state, the authorities, the public, the Russian flag or the constitution can be fined up to 100,000 rubles under the new legislation. Repeat offenders can be jailed for up to 15 days. The violation of this Law warrants inclusion to a Federal List of Extremist Materials and the Federal List of Extremist websites.
Here are some examples of forbidden content:
And the Blacklist:
The point here is that once you make it into those lists, there is no coming out. Furthermore, Extremism and Terrorism are related concepts. As such, inclusion to a Russian terrorism watch list is within the realm of possibility. Once that happens, anti-terrorism legislation takes over and your legal rights go up in smoke. Read moreLess
@WAGB283 No. So called hate speech (giving politically unfavorable views or cracking jokes) does not put him in jeopardy. What puts him in jeopardy is very nature of the site. This type of site is illegal in so called civilized (read orwellian world), and that is why we like it. But we also like freedom of speech.
@Omenomen Social Media sites are illegal? Where do you live man?
@WAGB283 I'll take the first amendment...over any group that sanctions it. "Hate speech in the United States is not regulated due to the robust right to free speech found in the American Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that hate speech is legally protected free speech under the First Amendment.
Hate speech in the United States - Wikipedia
@bondojoe Thats nice, but we are not registered or located in the US.
Even if we were, the 1st Amendment regulates the interactions between the government and its citizens and as such doesnt apply to legal entities or exchanges between natural persons.
@JudgeDredd Where you are located is irrelevant. Either the site can provide a healthy discourse between people, or it provides censorship. If it cannot provide freedom of speech to Americans, the British, or other Europeans here, and those that live in countries where freedom is sacrosanct...then it cannot provide a service that we can use...other than providing movies. Simply just say that we are not allowed to speak the truth, even if it offends other people, and we will go elsewhere. If the right to free speech is not sancrant here... those that live by the first amendment SHOULD leave of their own accord. I have known many people that have..and it looks like more are on their way. There's hardly a point in waiting until you are banned.
@bondojoe Freedom of Speech does not equal to Freedom to Abuse others. The following are your limitations while you participate in the forums. Its not rocket science, just common sense based on the principle of respect for your fellow man. If you cant understand that, then you are not fit to participate in any society, including this one.
"You shall not defame, stalk, bully, abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate people or entities and you shall not post private or confidential information via DosMovies, including, without limitation, yours or any other person's credit card information, social security or alternate national identity numbers, non-public phone numbers or non-public email addresses.
You shall not create or submit unwanted email, comments, likes or other forms of commercial or harassing communications (spam) to any of DosMovies users."
@JudgeDredd Everyone understands that. It's not brain surgery. THIS is the problem..." ."The Site Administration has the right .. but is not obliged to check the Site for prohibited Content and can delete or remove (without giving advance notice) any Content or Users at its own discretion for any reason or without reason" ..It's like taxation without representation. That's why Americans fought the civil war. There's NO reason for a statement like "."The Site Administration has the right" It's total dictatorship. You can muddy the waters all that you like. Clear thinking people will see the problem with that policy. I SAID the same thing that you said, in an earlier post..." As long as you aren't threatening anyone, or disclosing personal information...it's just words." You can stretch this out forever..but this IS absurd...and the reason that people will leave... ... " ."The Site Administration has the right but is not obliged to check the Site for prohibited Content and can delete or remove (without giving advance notice) any Content or Users at its own discretion for any reason OR WITHOUT REASON. Read moreLess
@bondojoe If you understand that I dont see where the problem is. If you respect your fellow man you will never have to worry about any prescribed limitations in the ToS.
I think you are confusing social media sites with parliamentary processes. Your participation in social media does not produce any legal rights and responsibilities, in the sense that your opinion does not affect any legislative process or governmental policy.
What you are asking is not a democratic process. This is a private site. As such any discussion about equality of rights amounts to a business partnership. This is the only way where you can enjoy the same rights as the owner of the website. That means that you would have to enjoy not only the benefits but the liabilities as well. Do you see where this is going?
In regards to the language of the ToS, it is absolutely essential to protect the site against the liability of its members. But in order to claim a disclaimer of such liability, one has to prove that he has effective and unlimited control, in order to demonstrate proactive measures undertaken to limit exposure to any such potential liability. This is common and an essential element in all business structures and models. Have a look at ANY Terms and Conditions and you will discover similar if not identical language. In that sense, are you seriously expecting that any private entity will shed away from its legal protection just so you can feel unburdened from potentially perceived dictatorial conduct?
Let me give you a simple example. You own your house. You have visitors over. There are certain rules that are deemed essential to you, such as the prohibition that your visitors burn down your house, torture your dog, have sex with your family members, kick you out of your own house, wage war with your neighbors etc etc. You as a master of the house, you expect that your rights remain respected by your visitors. In the case they arent you have an unlimited right to discipline them, bring them back to order and/or kick them out of your house. You need a reason to exercise your rights or no reason at all that you wish to explain.
Same scenario here. In fact, exactly the same. Read moreLess
@bondojoe If you're not satisfied with the service ... ask for your money back!
Buh bye. Buh bye now
@JadeEnigma LOL! Are you going somewhere? I'm waiting to see if things change...or if I get thrown off for speaking the truth! But I DO think I will exit, until President Trump is re-elected. THEN I will come back and enjoy the ambiance.
@bondojoe I'm not going anywhere little bodyshop boy. And you won't be back because that nazi is going to jail very soon.
@JadeEnigma Little bodyshop boy?
Can we be a little more respectful toward people of different opinion? Especially when they did not come after us first.
@Omenomen Racism and bigotry is not a difference of opinion. If you are a trump supporter, you support racism and bigotry and certainly deserve absolutely no respect from decent, moral, ethical people.
@JadeEnigma Yes, I do support Trump, thanks.
By the way, Captain Marvel picture is better. More fits to your nature. It's somehow luxuriant.
@Omenomen Trump is a worthless sack of sh*t and every single person who supports him is a worthless sack of sh*t. They deserve nothing but derision and a stick to wipe them off of the shoes of decent people.
@Omenomen I think @Jade likes you.
@Omenomen When did Captain Marvel get a sex change?
@JadeEnigma did mouse tell you that or did you think of it all by youself.
@1FRAC1 You mean Bubonic Mouse Dropping? Take care--I hear it's contagious...
@JadeEnigma Jade you have zero idea about how we think. I have an opinion of you don't doubt that. As far as my president goes, it is none of your business. State your opinions on your country whatever socialist sh*thole it might be, it has to be a fabulous place if there are lots like you.
@JadeEnigma you called me racist just because i am a conservative ,, now you call the US president a nazi , you have become a bully trying to silence your opposition
@JadeEnigma Only you can get away with name calling. I rest my case.
@bondojoe As long as you speak the truth in a respectful way, you will never be thrown out.
In any case, what the heck are you so worried? I am not interested in moderating in here. I was named Mod here to tackle residual abuse from the banned members of Anysubj.
Did you see me importing the implementing rules of the ToS that apply to Anysubj? No
@bondojoe PRECISELY THAT.
THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION COULDN'T CARE LESS ABOUT WHAT WE ARE PRATTLING ABOUT HERE.
WHAT STATE SECRETS OR ANTI-RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA IS BEING DISSEMINATED HERE?
INCIDENTALLY RE: COPYRIGHT LAWS--RUSSIA IS ONE OF THE PLANETS' MOST PROFLIGATE VIOLATORS.
CHECKED ANY .RU DOMAINS IN THE LAST 30 YEARS? I AM RUSSIAN--TAKE MY WORD FOR IT.
SMH AS STRAWS ARE GRAPPLED WITH AND FOR.
Sticks and stones can break my bones but words can never hurt me. Didn't we all learn that when we were six ? Assholes and their words can only hurt you as much as you let them. Most often civility is reciprocated. When it's not, take comfort in the fact that it's obvious to everyone who is the jerk and who is not. If you want to dish it out, you have to take it as well.Keep in mind anyone can have a bad day. Let bygones be bygones.A little slack, understanding and forgiveness can go a long way.Buckle up buttercup or don't participate.
@Bread&Circuses jade can name call anytime no repercussions.
@Bread&Circuses lol I love it!
Oh, thanks for clarifying--now I understand--listing the manufacturer's printed
ingredients of indications pamphlets THAT ACCOMPANY ALL VACCINES IS HATE SPEECH?
THANK GOD FOR THE MODERATORS WHO CLARIFY SUCH PUZZLING DILEMMAS.
I was blind and now I see.
By cherry-picking select international jurisdiction's censorship guidelines PER
CONVENIENCE TO SHUT DOWN FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND DEBATE it's a wonder ANY EXPRESSION
WHATSOEVER IS ALLOWED--WELL ANY that doesn't fall in line--oh wait, it's
The malignancy of cancel-culture is now spreading from [email protected] to Dosmovies. Beware.
Hmmm....suggestions for Anysubj.com. I'm not sure how exactly to help get more members online over there. I wish I could help advertise the site. I just don't have enough internet presence to make a difference. I hardly ever get on facebook. I don't do twitter or instagram. The only online community I'm really part of is this one.
Maybe one suggestion and I'm not sure if it will help or not. Some people may be turned off by all the political posts from the extreme right or left. Why not leave politics off the little anysubj box here on two movies? Also leave political posts off the home page for anysubj so that a prospective new member will not see them unless they specifically click on the politics community. That is the only suggestion I can think of.
I really wish I could help bring more traffic to the sites because I love both of them and would hate to see either go.
@rickgrimesrocks Actually we have (almost) done both. The Admin banned politics in 2M permanently and temporarily in Anysubj. He also removed the visibility of the posts on Politics in the Best posts on anysubj.com box here in 2M.
In any case, I would like to thank you for your concern and your kind offer to assist.
@rickgrimesrocks Is a great suggestion
This is the last time i`m going to be posting in this thread, and having read through the above, i stand by my initial thought that any sub stuff belongs there. The things that Tamperer71 are posting are not only stupid but potentialy life threatening.Insecure people and people with emotional issues may be swayed by the thing`s he / she is saying. The few who seem to be defending him and doing so by insulting and belittling others has no place here.
@Stickmanuk Your opining impact is that of a loaf of bread thrown off of the roof of a one story house--disbarred/unemployed/NJ lawyers notwithstanding.
@Tamperer71 ....and you just proved his entire opinion correct
You are what we lawyers like to call a "self resolving problem"
@Stickmanuk Interestingly, this is exactly what got him banned from Anysubj, as well as all the others who were in the business of insulting and belittling others
This is quite a good expression of Judgys Mod-Job.
so show some respect
(notabene: Judgy is NOT the one on the right or middle)
if you guess the movie, i might send you an orio
@Adrian88 I used a simple trick, and my plan was working
But no. It was cheating, so the orio should wait for a real winner
@Omenomen you are a truely honest soul, baby...
(sorry, watching "Once upon a time in Hollywood" at the moment,
thats why the 60s slang)
This is an asinine and pointless thread.
Bones are thrown out to watch the dogs vituperate against one another. ADMIN. GOADS AND BAITS THEN SIT BACK AND LAUGH AT THE PUNISHED PLEBES.
Nothing is ever going to change on these 2 sites as the 'anointed' ones are in charge and enjoy abusing disfavored members until they leave out of sheer disgust.
Folks--much as in most bureaucratic governance absolute power corrupts absolutely--what's worse THIS IS AN IDIOCRACY.
@Tamperer71 and again.....Goodbye
@JudgeDredd seems curious that you'd even attempt to say you speak for everyone when the above posts show that's not at all a truism.
I'm sure many in your camp would agree with you but just as obviously that hardly encompasses everyones opinion.
Most free thinking people are quite well versed in how to say what they mean and feel no need for others acceptance of their thoughts.
However, you cats on the left are definitely the most clannish group I've ever encountered as you all wanna run around telling one another just how great your decisions are and backslapping one another for them when in honesty all you;ve ever done was to try and game, manipulate and define what is allowed or said and then claim victory when you've managed to silence your opponents with your nonsensical politically correct speech conflagrations and demands.
Please note there's no amount of name calling, denigration of anyones character or all the other crap slinging tactics the left so commonly sinks to in the above reply.
I'll bet dollars to donuts that will not be the case in response to this post Read moreLess
@mrkim56 Clannish group? "no amount of name calling, denigration of anyones character or all the other crap slinging tactics the left so commonly sinks to"?
Really? Thats funny.....What do you know of the person you are defending? I am guessing nothing. Otherwise I am quite certain you would be equally disgusted with him as I am. Of course there is the possibility that you know everything about him and which would also mean that you condone his abhorrent behavior. If the latter is the case, I was certainly wrong about you.
So let me give you a little introduction of who you are defending, his greatest hits, so to speak:
"Tamperer71 And the AP cites FkeBook--FUCK THIS AND FUKK PENNY--I AM OUT 9h"
"F*ck your mother for having birthed such the malignancy PENNY"
"Wow--but somebody's Cialis appears to have affected the wrong appendage Penny Dreadful!"
"1,000 pardons Judge Judy Dreadful--not even interesting enough to warrant a reply in address..."
"Bring it AMBULANCE CHASER"
"That from questionable, unsavory ragamufffin associations (that are so tightly knit--surprising they haven't all succumbed to ccp-19 kung flu)."
How about a clip where he is calling me a Dick?
And lets not forget his greatest contribution:
Yup, this is your Champion. Are you not ashamed of yourself? You should be. But who am I kidding? Since you consider any measure designed to protect the integrity of other members as "nonsensical politically correct speech conflagrations and demands", that only means you condone racism, sexism, abuse, harassment, intimidation, threats, violence, bullying and stalking. And you know what? That makes you worse than career criminals. At least they are true to their nature and own it. Oh and btw, the "free thinking people" that you are referring to, are most probably in jail by now. Same place where most of the people you defend, should be.
If this is what you represent; if this is what you advocate for....your disapproval is a BADGE OF HONOR!!!!! Read moreLess
@JudgeDredd My, my, my, aren't you a very assuming individual JD. I'm sure you're well aware what is often said about "assuming", right? Well you just made a total arse out of yourself in doing so, but let me be somewhat more succinct in how that applies here.
You "assume" I'm defending anyone at all, which I'm not. Did I ever mention anyone whose actions I was defending? Nope, not once and there's solid reasoning behind that.
I related to you in private conversation recently that I don't meddle in that way in conversations and instead let the speaker do that for themselves, or not. Perhaps you missed that point then so I'm restating it here now so perhaps you'll "get it" instead of assuming otherwise in the future.
This is EXACTLY what I meant in saying "Most free thinking people are quite well versed in how to say what they mean and feel no need for others acceptance of their thoughts."
What you've basically done in your last post is to try and put words in my mouth I did not say. Let me once again state that I'm quite capable of commenting on any topic I so choose to and will NEVER need anyone to attempt to twist my words to mean anything other than what I clearly state!
The real problem here is obviated by the length and depth of this thread and though it's been reiterated numerous times, you seem to still be oblivious to the point. I do hafta wonder at this point if your own overblown sense of self worth and agrandizement is what continues to blind you to where the truth actually lies here?
I related long ago that your actions as a moderator were thuggish and obviously agendized and nothing since that time has lead me to change that view. While I'll admit I've seen at least some softening of your moderatory practices I've also seen your old position pop up in full force when you choose to "flex your muscles" in an attempt to bend others comments to your will.
BTW, being so thin skinned as to be unable to take criticism without threatening banishment of users is a sign of weakness, not strength.
When I 1st read, and I'm paraphrasing here, "Public discussion of moderator actions is not allowed and subjects the user to being banned" my very 1st thought was could one honestly be so openly dictatorial and not understand what those words actually mean?
I mean really man, those words could just have easily rolled off the tongues of the likes of Lenin, Stalin or Castro. I mean they were just as heavy handed in dealing with dissenting views and about the only difference here is you can't put users in reeducation camps or just off 'em.
Doc asked for suggestions and the ensuing tide of dissension regarding your actions is what stands out over and over in the discussion yet you just continue on and on about the validity of your actions.
Just hafta wonder man, who in reality is being decidedly thick here Read moreLess
@mrkim56 Fuck this. I just deleted my entire elaborate reply to you because I realized the futility of the effort. So lets get down to brass tacks.
You are full of sh*t.
Its that simple. You purposefully ignore everything I bring to the table (with undeniable proof, if I might add) and continue to deny defending your side while at the same time you continue attacking what you perceive to be mine. If this is your definition of neutrality, you might wanna check a dictionary.
The truth of the matter is that although you are not an offender yourself, you openly support the most vile of individuals I had the displeasure of ever knowing. And you attempt to justify this under the guise of a supposed censorship, which is none other than the suppression of the most disgusting and offensive expression of opinions I have ever seen. This includes racism, hate speech, blatant instances of hateful conduct, abusive conduct and personal attack, which you seem to find quite acceptable. And to add insult to injury, you accuse the "left" of the very same things that you find acceptable and pull a Virgin Mary routine for the "right". Pretending that they dont know how to utter a swearword while being the perpetual victims of abuse and persecution.
I dont really wanna get into your delusions of persecution, especially when you repeatedly state:
"BTW, being so thin skinned as to be unable to take criticism without threatening banishment of users is a sign of weakness, not strength."
To this I can only say that as this entire thread is criticizing my performance and as I havent banned or threatened anyone for their criticism, that makes me by your logic, Superman. Thank you for that btw
So in the end of the day, you are just as bad as they are. Guilty by association. And to be more precise, you are an accessory after the fact.
An accessory-after-the-fact is someone who assists 1) someone who has committed a crime, 2) after the person has committed the crime, 3) with knowledge that the person committed the crime, and 4) with the intent to help the person avoid arrest or punishment. An accessory after the fact may be held liable for, among other things, obstruction of justice.
18 U.S. Code § 3. Read moreLess
@JudgeDredd Ok, so now we might actually be gettin somewhere. You just pulled your finger outta the dike so let's just see where that action leads, shall we?
Once again you attempt to attribute words I've yet to have uttered as if they existed somewhere in a big juicy bold font.
To say I have defended anyones statements is an act of pure fantasy, unless of course you can produce proof of such, which I can guaran-damned-tee you can not do!
I know full well how you get all bound up in legaleze any time anyone mentions free speech but dude/dudette/whatever, here's my thoughts on what it means to me:
I will always agree with anyones right to voice their opinion and my own agreement has no bearing on that right for anyone to be heard. Even in disagreement I will always defend anyones right to be heard and will defend that right with my last breath.
With the above being clearly stated just go ahead and get busy trying to contort my position to show that I somehow support anything other than anothers right to be heard. I mean it, get with the program and twist away if you can prove how that position purports to support anyone ... anyone? anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
So with that bit of business outta the way, let's move forward to another example of attempting to cleverly cherry pick some words I actually did pen by omitting the statements that followed:
"BTW, being so thin skinned as to be unable to take criticism without threatening banishment of users is a sign of weakness, not strength."
Naturally you chose to leave out the next paragraph:
"When I 1st read, and I'm paraphrasing here, "Public discussion of moderator actions is not allowed and subjects the user to being banned" my very 1st thought was could one honestly be so openly dictatorial and not understand what those words actually mean?"
I'll shorten the paragraph that follows and just say Lenin, Stalin and Castro would have been proud to have called you comrade :>)
Oh and BTW, you did in fact more than threaten action against others in the opening comments of this thread, hell you flat out handed out 2 bans.
With that in mind, take off the cool suit with the big S on the front, neatly fold it and the flowing red cape and put 'em back in the box and go get your $$ back. Read moreLess
@mrkim56 "Oh and BTW, you did in fact more than threaten action against others in the opening comments of this thread, hell you flat out handed out 2 bans."
Ahhh..I now see the problem. You cant read. Otherwise how would you mistake clear abusive and defamatory conduct towards the Admin, myself and Xanthe:
1 instance of "nutjob Dick tater", 3 instances of "Karen", 1 swamp-donkey, 1 Judge Spite and 1 corruption for me, 1 leprosy, 1 Viper-Pit, 1 Clownworld.com for the Admin and 1 instance of "Karen" for Xanthe....and lets not forget the wonderful video testimony of what will happen to me if consume a Viagra.
All those were instances of constructive criticism according to you. Well Done.
BTW, the publicly discussing Admin actions is a rule pre-existing my appointment by about 8 years. Well done on that front too.
On the rest of your "arguments" I have already replied. And I am not in the habit of repeating myself. Whether you choose to acknowledge my replies or not, is inconsequential to me.
As for your "Comrade" quip, all I can say is that David Duke, the Grand Dragon of Ku Klux Klan, would be proud to call you a Klansman. Read moreLess
@JudgeDredd Now you are gravely stepping out. The first message was freaking out, now it's a malicious attack. Completely unnecessary and unprovoked.
@Omenomen ALL THAT SHE SPOUTS IS ANTI-AMERICAN AND REVOLTING. Admins. show repeatedly that truth is dead and only propaganda is worth posting. IDEAL APPARATCHICKS! QUIET DOWN OR YOU'LL BE BANNED
@JudgeDredd thanks oh so much for another positionally adjudicated diatribe filled with inconsistencies, obviations of fact and outright distortions of what actually exists in reality. That's quite a roll you're on there.
While claiming you've not threatened any poster in this thread with actions regarding their comments, when confronted with the obvious truth that this is a fallacious claim you then pivot and lash out claiming their disparaging remarks about your actions as a moderator were attacks that then justified your actions.
You use your powers as a mod on anysub and wield your friggin ban hammer as if you were the omnipotent delineator of what's righteous and just. Let me simply state that's not always the case and your overblown sense of self righteousness is actually disgusting all in all. Even the choice of your own avatar says TONS about the online personna you choose to put forward.
Of course that's never the case in the eyes of your backslapping posse when you've just slapped down someones comments and they all laud you vociferously with their laurels, heaping praise and admiration upon you as if you'd just claimed a Nobel Peace Prize for having once more graced them with your self righteous acts of judicial wisdom.
And my, my how you just LOVE to go on and on about how your career choice in itself makes you the most perfect judge of what is then just. The truth of that is it's just more self aggrandized bloviation meant to somehow place all your determinations above reproach.
And how about if I had written a post to you saying "F___ This!" or telling the mighty Judge Dred "You're full of s___!" I'd be sure to have gotten at least a warning for using that kind of language, but no, the mighty Judge Dred can do or say whatever without fear of retribution because I don't wield the mighty power of your ban hammer. I honestly doubt you can even see just how two faced such actions are. "Do as I say, not as I do!" Yep, that's about the size of it.
You can mention once more how discussing admin actions predates your appointment as a mod for effect but the reality still remains that you have bent and/or outright refused to address other rules when it suits you, though rarely if ever have you done so regarding that one. Hell no, you jump on that one with both feet simply because it's a convenient way of protecting your fragile ego and silencing any dissenting view of your moderatory actions, all in one fell swoop.
Lastly you once again have laid another baseless claim that I am a racist without even offering a whiff of anything to support such a malicious attack on my character. But hey, just one more obviation of what isn't fact thrown on the heaping pile you continue to grow ever higher, so, so what right? I mean the mighty Judge Dred said it so it MUST then be a truism, right? Read moreLess
@mrkim56 "I mean the mighty Judge Dred said it so it MUST then be a truism, right?"
@JudgeDredd More self aggrandized bloviation, how quaint.
I fully understand your failure to address anything else when simply tooting your own horn is so much more satisfying than actually trying to make a case for your own misspoken garp
Must admit I'm surprised you didn opt for calling me a racist again though.
@mrkim56 You are a very dangerous person, Mr. Kim. You should be in jail! No, you should be sent to a re-education camp. That would make you less law-breaking and more mod-cheering person. That would make you... calm.
@Omenomen Ha, the only danger I pose is that when someone asks me a question they'd best be able to take the response they'll get to their query as I choose to never mince words.
People who know me well understand this, others, not so much and are typically stunned when I fail to tip toe around any delicate sensibilities in my replies.
At this point in life re-eductaion is an assured impossibility in my case.
Like Popeye said "I Yam what I Yam!"
@mrkim56 Mr. Kim--I must say--I have a newfound respect and admiration for you--you demolished with logic, reason, wit and astute intelligence! TKO--WELL DONE, THAT!!
And somehow without resorting to debasement or lowbrow humiliation, Kudos...Bravo!! Here, Here.
you cats on the left are definitely the most clannish group I've ever encountered as you all wanna run around telling one another just how great your decisions are and backslapping one another
Wow, that sounds good. How do I join?
@Buttless Still hankering for a good spanking hey Buttless? -GC
@saxon901 Hey Saxon, where have you been?
Yes, I miss Delamitri and her 'correction'.
That might work on some of the trouble-makers here!
@Buttless If I remember correctly any.sudj was supposed to be a refuge for those of us that enjoyed a bit of to and fro and then it turned into something akin to Twitter and wasn't fun anymore once the cancel culture mob crossed over and the rules became draconian. So I decided to stay away. Just couldn't resist replying to your comment. -GC .
I need someone to summarize all this stuff posted in a couple of sentences.
As I understand one group of people wants anarchy, another one - the law. This is not possible.
Maybe mods should be less strict, I'm not sure. I will ask JD to react only to complaints that users send.
@Dr.Evil Rousseau once said something really weird, but at the same time - true. He said that in a good state people are multiplying, in a bad one, their number is decreasing. Every state is based on some kind of law. You should think about your laws, Doc.
@Dr.Evil And I will tell you how that would end up. A conservative writes something, one or two liberals report him, the mod reacts, a dozen of conservatives stand in a defense of the accused, they are bitter, loud and even more provoking. That solves nothing.
@Dr.Evil If you allow this person (sure you can guess who) continue to sling sh*t, the problems will never end.
He has no boundaries and is the most hateful person I've ever known on here.
As a matter of fact this person sent me a message just to be confrontational (which I have ignored.) There will never be any peace if people like this are allowed to spew their hate.
The reason I don't visit here often is people like this make this site much less enjoyable. There's enough stress in this world right now without this crap.
Thanks for asking
@Dr.Evil Ok, stated simply and succinctly AGAIN Doc.
Make the political and religious sections of the forum at anysub a no-holds barred free for all zone and stop trying to sanitize it with heavy handed agendized moderation.
If a user chooses to enter those areas of the forum they are doing so of their own free will and all complaints should be ignored.
That was supposed to have been the point in the creation of anysub so why has it simply turned into an extension of Dos Movies instead?
I understand such discussions aren't for everyone so why should it be a problem for those who prefer to stay out of such discussions to simply not go there in the 1st place
@mrkim56 The problem that politics community floods the whole site if we allow too much freedom, do you understand? It wasn't created as a politics site. Any subj - any subject, any topic you may discuss.
@Dr.Evil In previous discussions about the formation of anysub and even discussions about the political forums on the old 2 Movies I offered a solution to that exact issue.
Make a hard and fast rule that ALL political conversations were allowed ONLY within the confines of that category and moderators should be empowered to enforce that rule by deletion of politically based threads placed in other categories and if the user continues to drag politics elsewhere they should be reprimanded and or banned, problem solved.
@mrkim56 What about laws about hate speech and racism?
@Dr.Evil Like the posts here I read almost every day filled with stealthy condescension, which is really nothing short of hateful speech, by members that never gets a whiff of moderation?
Or are you speaking about the constant claims of racism by members who inspect every nook and cranny of anothers posts always in search of anything they can then deem as infectious racism?
I've read multiple posts here claiming others were racists just because they support President Trump and claim no other proof is even necessary, so is that not hate speech?
I damned sure see it that way, but you, nor any other mod has ever heard me complain to you about these remarks because I see their validity as very telling of the mentality of the poster, so why should I bother?
The real problem here is that conservatives always welcome any point of view as valid while the left continually seeks to silence those who oppose them.
@Dr.Evil > As I understand one group of people wants anarchy, another one - the law.
Very insightful way of putting it, exactly so.
> I will ask JD to react only to complaints that users send.
As both Omenomen and Mouse deduced, all that will result in is having both sides continually lodging complaints against the other. The results will be that JD will still be doing the same thing he is doing now, but with a flooded inbox.
It's almost impossible to walk a middle line with this sort of thing, you want to make sure the (Российская Федерация) law is on your side in this, anarchy won't serve you well, if at all.
Consider JD's advice, he's more knowledgeable in internet law and jurisdictions, by far, than anything most of us could provide.
@WAGB283 Such a sadness that anyone would view the ability to just speak freely as anarchy.
I'm not trying to say I support racism, sexism or the other litany of -isms and -obias as I don't.
Like's already been stated above people who do will make that case individually and it then becomes apparent for others to see.
There's no need for censorship or moderation in topics regarding politics or religion as ANY such type action will always be called out by free thinking people as a demand for submission to the censorers position which is hardly anything resembling open communication.
@mrkim56 I agree in principle, but consider that everyone who posts is not you and may not have your regard for ethics and civility, any opinion can be expressed without devolving into what some could interpret as hate, that determination is not just subjective in many jurisdictions.
But again, everyone who posts is not 'you'.
And, yes, there are actual laws that the site can be found in violation of if it is determined that the site owner didn't exercise due diligence in it's regulation.
Also consider that there is no 1st amendment in the Russian Federation (where this site is registered) and that Russian law vis-a-vis 'speech' is somewhat, shall we say, 'mutable' in that regard.
What all that boils down to is that regardless of what some of us, on this side of the pond, may consider as a God given (or at least Constitutional) right, the world is a lot bigger place that America, and if your on this site, you're 'not in Kansass anymore, Toto'.
@WAGB283 YOU JUST QUITE IN A MOST EXCELLENT MANNER DELINEATED THE VERY THESIS OF YOUR DEMAGOGUERY AND MINDLESS MOB MENTALITY.
TO NARROW MINDS
F R E E D O M = anarchy. That's the VERY FOUNTAINHEAD OF
T H E C U L T U R A L R E V O L U T I O N
FOR AND BY
THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING.
CRITICAL THINKING, ANALYSES AND DEBATE BE DAMNED.
I ASK YOU THIS--WHAT ARE YOU DOING OFF OF FACEBOOK AND AWAY FROM CANDY-CRUSH SAGA??
@Tamperer71 Let's ban idiots who only use CAPITALS and BOLD.
@Buttless I CAN'T SEE MY 40" PC MONITOR FROM ACROSS MY ROOM.
IS THAT ALL RIGHT WITH YOU?
YOU ARE SO REDUCTIVE AND INSIGNIFICANT THAT IT REALLY IS NOT WORTH THE BOTHER OF PULLING DOWN THE BLOCK MENU AND BE RID OF YOU ONCE AND FOR ALL.
YOUR DIMINISHED FACULTIES AND GIBBERINGS ARE QUITE AMUSING ACTUALLY.
KEEP AT IT--YOU KNOW SOMETIMES THE CLOWN IS THE FEATURED ATTRACTION IN TRAVELLING CIRCUSES--IF THAT DOESN'T WORK OUT YOU CAN ALWAYS FALL BACK ON YOUR INFAMY AS A
B A R N Y A R D
O D D I T Y
SO BY ALL MEANS, KEEP ON KEEPING ON!!
@Dr.Evil and apply punishment evenly, which as much as jd may think he has, he hasn't. he is very biased , i went to anysub the other was called a racist which i am not , yet if a conservative calls someone libtard they get punished, anysub has become a bashing ground towards conservatives backed by your mod
I KNOW THAT'S RIGHT.
@Dr.Evil It would appear from reading this that to improve things you need to keep your moderators from engaging with the commenters and just upholding the rules. Quite clearly JudgeDredd is feeding the trolls! Never feed a troll or you wont get rid of it
@Dr.Evil As @KingOfTrump eloquently and concisely put it--triggering/contentious posts just need a warning of disputed content--the post should be blurred--aside from the heading on forum topics--and if indeed they are triggered too bad--they were warned and chose to consent--e. g., like they bllur graphic images on Fakebook before entering. that is the most logical and fair protocol.
Any other route is open to confirmation bias and inherent prejudices that will never be avoided,
Moderators need to stay out of adult's business unless the actual law is broken, American Law--as I pointed out in another post here--Russia couldn't care less of content so long as free movies are offered for them before .RU sites have them. They actually despise American socials and even have their own respective WWW.--i. e. .RU Domains.
If members are having interpersonal contentions they need to be directed to block the other member--not run crying to a moderator. ... Let's get some face and dignity back to what started as an idyllic site--I'm referring to dosmovies. I'm not interested what happens at that other site. It's mishandlings have been far to egregious to pedal back now. That is a dead site. Its' reputation precedes it and you know precisely why. Read moreLess
I believe the best Moderator any(ban) has had, is @JudgePestilence non bias and strict, but with out over doing it (remembers there is a human being behind the post/comment).
And when it comes to people complaining about someone's post/comment, when they or blocked by that person (logging out to read), well it needs to stop (just don't follow up complaint's against blocked members).
Edit: As for the censorship of post that go against the MSM (one of the reasons i left the site), makes the site no diff then Facebook.
The only thing I wish I could do on here that I can't, is to reorder my playlist lists. Be able to change the order. Everything else is perfect especially you doc!
I don't have a problem with anysubj. Many times i read funny posts and i am having fun. I also learn new things from users while we chat. I would like to see it more cosmopolitan, like having arabs, eastern europeans, russian, chineese, israelis, latin american e.t.c users. I know there are present watching the movies and the topics but they don't declare active in the chat. I ask myself "why". So an answer i give to myself is that they think it's an "american social chat". I wouldn't say far right or far left or whatever. I seen users from left and right wings chating and there are disapointed ppl from both the sides. This is normal as politics constantly disapoint ppl on every direction lol. So what makes it "an american social site"? is it the language that has to be english... No. Must be something else. The site is what users make of it. As a start to become more cosmopolitan is maybe to have parts (subforums attached to the main) that will attract users from a certain region (for example European Forum, Asian, e.t.c ) But then again this to be realized would require more web design work and more moderation in numbers. This would give Doc and JD extra work. Would that be possible? I don't know. Isn't democracy what we make of it? Do we deserve something more when we vow for something less?
... Anyway my top off for Doc, JD, JP and the others i missed mentioning for the effort and time they dedicate here Read moreLess
Again, this thread is a textbook on what you don't want on a website.
@PsychoDeeDee Oh you mean FREE THOUGHT AND DEBATE?
WHAT THE ACTUAL HELL ARE THEY THINKING!?
"QUICK--REPORT TO THE MOD. BY THE MOB!!"
Anyone in their right mind sees that [email protected] is a moot non sequitur--you
couldn't pay me to go back.
RE: THE TWICE REMOVED FORUM THREAD HERE AT DOSMOVIES ON VACCINE
DELIBERATIONS AND CHOICE--what politics is that? IT'S NOT POLITICAL
UNLESS FALSELY AND INCORRECTLY SUBVERTED INTO POLITICIZATION--
AND THAT WOULD BE BOTH IGNORANT AND PREJUDICED. If the efforts of
members attempting TO ENRICH THIS SITE ARE RIDICULED, SUMMARILY CENSORED
AND DISMISSED then THEY'll not be bothering again. The actual problem
is peepS unappreciatively destroying the efforts and caring enough
of others to bother posting without stereotyping or assuming their
intentionS--NEVER MIND THE ACTUAL CONTENT OF THE POSTS. THAT'S THE
[u]ACTUAL PROBLEM.[/u] Otherwise THE FACTS ARE THAT this site some of
its' bombastically falsely outraged, virtue signalling members are
becoming One clown short of a circus. wtACTUALf?
... Doc., you own this site and you expressly and sadistically permit a
certain moderator to harass and torture members that express alternate
heretical views. THAT says EVERYTHING ABOUT WHERE YOUR HEART,
SOUL AND MIND ARE. I accurately predicted that [email protected] would peak at 13
dissociated members and there it climaxed.
Careful what you wish for--a certain competing movie site has 3 times the
members and active daily users, at all times, of
Dosmovies and I foresee a mass migration over yonder--there will go your
ad revenues and disregard for what once was integrity and sincere
humanity of your jurisdiction.
I may have acted inappropriately at times with said moderator-guilty-
culprit--I own it and when you know better you do better (You cannot say
that of the mod in question)
IT DIDN'T MATERIALIZE OUT OF A Vacuum I certainly will never bow down to
the abuse of/by others with blandishments and ingratiation to remain in
their favor nor to reduce myself to a belittled and diminished member,
NOW, I'm done because THAT is all. Read moreLess
why are you allowing dread to selectively
"adjudicate" DOUBLE JEOPARDY on violations from an altogether different website?
is that fair and equitable in any universe?
I have cleaned up my act but my persecution has not ceased since the inactivity of the other site has somehow compelled your personal torturer in proxy to continue harassing members here.
I knew this was a pro-Trump channel in the forums long before 2016. Politics is not a problem.
The worst of this is the channel page set up. There is more hardcore pornography on any site I can think of.
No, it is just this one alone. Hard Core pornography.
And moderators approved by Dr. Evil.
@ginger666 Seems that's not considered as sexism tho. How did that happen
@ginger666 Agreed on both counts--Dosmovies is the LAST place I would get my porn from--it is HETEROBIASED, NOT ONE GAY PORNO. Furthermore I' have first hand witnessed @Pizzaslice mock and disparage BATGIRL LESBIANTICS. i HATE CATGIRL, OR WHOEVER THAT IS--but my comment in defense of Gay rights and equality was removed and @pizzaslice's remains up. I'm an adult and I HANDLED IT. You see what I mean about inherent prejudice and confirmation bias by moderators?
Here is my summary Dr.Evil :
1. All the banned members of Anysubj want the rules abolished;
2. All the remaining members who are repeat offenders want my head on a platter;
3. Everybody is innocent of everything;
4. The other side is to blame for everything;
5. When the "Conservative" side abuses, its called freedom of Speech;
6. When that side is on the receiving end of the abuse, its called persecution;
7. Dispensing Warnings, is ban bait;
8. Dispensing Suspensions is retribution and abuse of power;
9. The ToS serves a communist dictatorial agenda;
10. We are funded by Soros and the Gates/Clinton Foundations.
The only useful thing I learned from this thread, is that if you treat people in the same way they treat you, they get offended.
Couldn't be more pathetic than that.
@JudgeDredd Moderators by definition are mandated to neutrality--a concept foreign to your karma.
Every other thing you say is a spiteful personal attack and you are now threatened about your day of reckoning.
@JudgeDredd what a whine-fest, but fair enough, you spoke your mind, so here's my thoughts for the counter-view:
1. All the banned members of Anysubj want the rules abolished;
Just the ones that confound real and open communication.
2. All the remaining members who are repeat offenders want my head on a platter;
Hardly a truism. What most folks seem to want is actual neutral moderation, not ham-fisted agendized moderation. Sadly I honestly don't feel you're capable of such actions, at least not by what I've seen displayed.
3. Everybody is innocent of everything;
By the definitions you've made public in your ban thread about the only things that could be considered innocent are conversations about cute lil puppies and kittens. Any topic past that gets scoured for any type of dissenting comments or opinions you can find and then admonish.
4. The other side is to blame for everything;
Only the side that disagrees with you and your friends positions. Yakno, the ones who hafta carefully select every single word in their posts under threat that any misstep will lead to another warning, if not an outright ban.
5. When the "Conservative" side abuses, its called freedom of Speech;
By YOUR determinations no such freedom exists. Here's a clue, your type of agendized silencing of opponents using the tenets of politically correct speech will NEVER find purchase among free thinking people.
6. When that side is on the receiving end of the abuse, its called persecution;
Nope, but it's damned sure exactly that when the only ones getting treated to your ban hammer are the same bunch who are always in disagreement with you and your posses agendized positions.
7. Dispensing Warnings, is ban bait;
Your "warnings" are just another way of silencing dissenting views with the underlying threat that if they don't bend to your will they'll surely know what's coming next.
8. Dispensing Suspensions is retribution and abuse of power;
Alas, we finally find some agreement, BRAVO!
9. The ToS serves a communist dictatorial agenda;
Certain aspects of it absolutely does. Saying a mods actions are somehow above reproach and discussing them publicly is a bannable offense is exactly what I'd expect from a dictatorial regime, so, yeah.
10. We are funded by Soros and the Gates/Clinton Foundations.
Oh, now I get the joke! This has all been a comedy bit right? Haha, yeah that's a good one right there :>)
The only useful thing I learned from this thread, is that if you treat people in the same way they treat you, they get offended.
I think what you SHOULD have found is that when your powers are muted and open discussion is allowed about your use and misuse of them there's a lot more disention that stems from that abuse than is allowed to BE discussed otherwise. Read moreLess
@mrkim56 "The only innocent things are conversations about cute lil puppies and kittens".
You nailed it, BIG MAN!
It should go straight to the movies!
@mrkim56 THANK YOU!!!!!!
You just proved all of my points correct.
@JudgeDredd not sure exactly by what type of convoluted logic you can make such a statement but like I always say you're certainly welcome to hold an opposing view.
For myself I'm just glad that voices from outside your circle were actually allowed to be spoken freely for once without you threatening every dissenting view being stated.
Dude, as harshly as this conversation has turned against your moderation tactics perhaps it's time you stop just trying to deny everything and take a few steps back and try looking at your previous actions from a more objective position
@mrkim56 "perhaps it's time you stop just trying to deny everything and take a few steps back and try looking at your previous actions from a more objective position"
I think you should take your own advice here
@JudgeDredd Exactly the type and tenor of reply I expected.
Neither you nor I are omniscient on ANY topic.
I just wish you could put away your ego and grasp that yours is NOT the only view that holds validity.
Bottom line is I like you dude but you're never gonna get me to say I enjoy your thuggish, one sided moderation style. Just not gonna happen.
@mrkim56 Its all good. We agree to disagree.
@Buttless so stop eating
@1FRAC1 I'd go so far as to call it Bulemic gorging--except like the Romans--where they would purge only so they could continue hoggishly bingeing.
What a pair of twats, screenshot speaks for itself... These are the type of people poisoning this website because they have been rejected from Anysubject.....
@𝓜𝓸𝓾𝓼𝓮*🐭 ^^^^ These are the type of jerks that make this place not so nice....