Legal Experts React to Trump's Interview With Bret Baier on Fox News (626 views, 37 replies)
master
Oh wow!!! He confessed to obstruction of justice on live TV. His lawyer must be jumping out of the window by now.... 
@JudgeDredd 
you can't post and reply to yourself!
You must think A LOT of us are suckers 
@CollideDuhScope I am not sure I understand your logic. I didnt post any questions. I posted the article and beneath I offered my personal comment. How does that qualify as a reply?
@JudgeDredd Remember what Nixon said on 60 minutes that when a man is president he is above the law and not subject to prosecution. I know that wasn't his exact words but very close. I guess Trump is hoping for the same reprieve
@💛Yellow_rose1💛 I remember that exchange. I also remember that it didnt end well for Nixon.
@💛Yellow_rose1💛 There was a TV doco about Nixon, showed him very friendly with a young Don T.
Maybe Don was the apprentice?
@JudgeDredd The suggestion that he plead insanity is hilarious. But only because his massively overinflated ego would definitely not allow such a thing.
There is no way he would do that. I honestly think he'd probably rather go to prison than go that route. But... If he did, that would certainly make sure he couldn't run for president, so I'm on board.
@⍟LiviaD34D⍟ Quite right. It would have been hilarious but sadly he cant plead insanity. There are specific conditions to be met before the plea of insanity and unfortunately being a moron isnt one of them.
@JudgeDredd Yes, being an incompetent idjit with small hands and an unhealthy love of McDonald's doesn't count.
senior master
@Buttless Probably because Fox has practically been blowing him for years, altering some facts, conveniently leaving out others, even outright lying to their viewers. He probably trusted them. The thing is, whether they were trying to make him look good or bad, no one can control that mouth of his, and he screwed himself.
@⍟LiviaD34D⍟ He just does not know when to keep quiet.
Jack Smith must be watching and laughing.
master
I thought this was a no politics forum? For certain there will be one hell of a rude awakening for some of us. Which side remains to be seen.
@JudgeDredd That is one fine line you have drawn there. I can stay within it and get some points across. Now that I see it's OK to bash and name call again. Or does that only work if we are tearing up Trump?
@fortunate1 The difference is that Trump is not a President anymore, nor the leader of the GoP. The bashing and the name calling is in relation to his private capacity, not his political role (which currently doesnt have one). You wanna retaliate by going after the other side? Don't really much care. But you have to limit yourself to people outside the political arena. People like Hunter Biden for instance, who is also not a politician nor he holds any type of public office.
master
I have made no secret of my love for Trump. Not being a pessimist, just a realist, the most powerful and cunning government in world history will NOT let this man run for nor win the 2024 election, either will be in a cell, dead, or wearing an ankle bracket with some kind of "New" constitutional law forbidding any president past or present who is under jurisdictional scrutiny, is not nor will be able to run for government office, or they will just shred the whole document altogether. We Do need him in office though but will it happen, these demons will never allow it. I keep praying.
@♱SKY♱ They do not care how they get it they want his head on a platter. Threat to their existence and lives.
@fortunate1 I'm sorry for all the delusional MAGA's... I swear, its heart wrenching. Yes, you are finally right - he's a threat to everyones existence and lives DO matter! 
master
Melania is finally speaking in public… and thrilled to still be above ground 
unlike the ex!
Similar forum topics
- A Must See Film “American Terror: The Military’s Problem With Extremism In The Ranks” + "VICE News T... (2 years ago)
- The Big Interview with Dan Rather (4 years ago)
- The Big Interview with Dan Rather (Seasons 1-11) (4 years ago)
- 𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑆𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 - ℑ𝔫𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔳𝔦𝔢𝔴 𝔚𝔦𝔱𝔥 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔙𝔞𝔪𝔭𝔦𝔯𝔢-ᴾʳᵉᵐⁱᵉʳᵉˢ ᴼᶜᵗᵒᵇᵉʳ ² (2 years ago)
- Trump tweet blindsides his own staff and fellow Republicans: ‘It’s starting to look like he doesn’t ... (4 years ago)
- detouring bay aarea water to not flow into ocean, is big mistake, says califorian: (6 years ago)
- Reasons to remove links (5 years ago)
- What's up with not been able to edit or delet your reviews? (3 years ago)
- Climate protesters glue themselves to Porsche museum but needed to go potty (2 years ago)
master
Numerous legal experts said former President Donald Trump's comments during a Monday evening appearance on Fox News could incriminate him, with one saying his defense attorneys "have to be cringing."
Trump, who is seeking another White House bid in 2024, joined Fox News host Bret Baier for a one-on-one interview on Monday during which the former president was grilled about the Department of Justice (DOJ)'s investigation into whether he mishandled classified documents after leaving office in 2021.
Trump pleaded not guilty to 37 charges in the case last week and has accused prosecutors of engaging in a "witch hunt." Trump also said that he was not in possession of military secrets but rather the documents referred to in the indictment were newspaper and magazine clippings.
Trump's interview quickly became a trending topic on social media where numerous legal scholars criticized Trump over his comments during the interview, including his response to an audio recording in which the former president allegedly admitted to having a classified document prepared by the U.S. military.
...
Read more