Cloverfield Paradox (somewhat explained cont) (1315 views, 13 replies)
guru
Check out the end of the original Cloverfield after those kids get killed by all that rubble the monster caused. Pics enclosed.
<br> 
<br> 
<br> 
<br> 
<br>
Hide 2 replies...
guru
Last night I watched each film back to back with my full attention. I just had to understand these films better <br>
guru
In one of the pics you'll see long digits wailing above the main mass that was falling <br>
Hide 3 replies...
@WEBHEAD🕸️ I watched the original last night and you can TOTALLY see it fall into the water! Great catch.
God
member
Similar forum topics
- The Cloverfield Paradox (somewhat explained) (7 years ago)
- The Cloverfield Paradox (7 years ago)
- The Ending Of Reacher Season 1 Explained (2 years ago)
- 10 Cloverfield Lane Official Trailer #1 (2016) (9 years ago)
- Alabama White BBQ Sauce (7 years ago)
- Boo-tiful Pumpkin Cake (7 years ago)
- ZOMBIE GENRE LOVERS (7 years ago)
- why you don't get points for posting movies in chatbox anymore? (6 years ago)
- The Next Cloverfield 2018- OVERLORD (6 years ago)
God
It’s tempting to read the final shot of the monster in The Cloverfield Paradox as proof that it’s in the same timeline as Cloverfield, but that’s not necessarily true: Ava’s husband Michael says in The Cloverfield Paradox that there are several of “those things” – unlike the singular monster in Cloverfield – and there’s no mention of The Cloverfield Paradox‘s energy crisis in Cloverfield, not to mention the fact that The Cloverfield Paradox is, unlike Cloverfield, set years in the future. There are little connections between the films – the Mark Stambler of this film recalls 10 Cloverfield Lane‘s Howard Stambler, and satellites crash in all three films – but it’s likely that these are just Easter Eggs.
Read more at www.nme.com/blogs/the-movies-blog...
How the crew of the Shepard are responsible for all the other films
The Cloverfield Paradox is set at some point in the future, but as Stambler says the particle accelerator of the film is capable of “ripping open the membrane of space-time”, smashing together multiple dimensions “in the past” and “in the future” as well as in their own time. This explains how the film interacts with the other two to date. The ‘bleeding’ effect we see – the arrival of Jensen, the disappearance of Mundy’s arm – has taken place on a massive scale at random points in different years and across multiple universes.
...
Read more