2000 Mules Distributor Apologizes, Removes Film (289 views, 10 replies)
master
Haha. Stupid trumpleton propaganda for dumb people, anyway. No one with half a brain believed that crap anyway.
master
Love the attempt to damage control by Salem Media Group:
“It was never our intent that the publication of the 2000 Mules film and book would harm Mr. Andrews. We apologize for the hurt the inclusion of Mr. Andrews’ image in the movie, book, and promotional materials have caused Mr. Andrews and his family,”
Somehow, this declaration seems self contradictory to the statements made in the film about Mr. Andrews (“What you are seeing is a crime. These are fraudulent votes.”)
Of course you realise that this statement in no way absolves or even mitigates the culpability and the award of the financial damages, which in my opinion will be reinforced with the imposition of punitive damages, usually awarded for egregious lapses of judgement, a.k.a. galactic stupidity. And this declaration is just that. It directly insults the intelligence of every judge, lawyer and legal analyst, who will no doubt find this as incredulous and as disingenuous as I do.
@JudgeDredd More info from Meidas.
Mark Andrews settled for 'an undisclosed significant amount'. I would love to know how many millions that is.
@Buttless That depends really. In a defamation case the amount of financial damages is established by taking into account the actual damage done to the reputation of the plaintiff, the geographic market of the distribution of the offending material and the profit made from that distribution. On a market the size of the USA, that could easily be in the range of 100 million dollars and up. If they chose to settle that can only mean that they agreed on an amount from 50% to 75% of the projected punitive damages. Getting 50 to 75 million now rather than 100 million 5 to 10 years from now, does make a lot of sense.
@JudgeDredd Does anyone want to say I'm a ballot-stuffer? I'd settle for $1M.
In fact a thousand would be useful at the moment!
@StarKissed Thanks Starkissed, I need that. 
But my bank says they have difficulty cashing your IOU... 
@Buttless lol, how are you? Glad to see you're still here. I'm so bored, I thought I'd reply on this thread and see if I could get in to trouble. 😉
senior guru
I don't remember this guy's name being mentioned in the film, but I imagine that would give him a crimp in his grimp, but there were LOTS more in the film that no one is disputing. I remember those. 😜
Similar forum topics
- The Sea That Thinks -2000- optical illusion (2 years ago)
- Close Encounters A 2000 film about Alien Contact (2 years ago)
- Film Suggestions (14 years ago)
- Favourite Film Of The Year (13 years ago)
- Foreign films that need subs adding. (7 years ago)
- 8 Films To Die For (7 years ago)
- 46 Movies With 'A+ CinemaScore' Since 2000. (7 years ago)
- Short Film Apocalypse (7 years ago)
- Winners of the 2018 tribeca film festival. (6 years ago)
senior master
2000 Mules (2022) supported the Big Lie about the 2020 US election, the reviews on here are quite ..diverse.
dosmovies.com/film/2000_Mules/re...
After a court case brought by one of the people falsely accused of stuffing ballot boxes, the film is withdrawn with an apology.